Hi, thanks for considering me for your project. I'll attach a sample of my written work below so you can get a feel for my abilities and style. I could have the articles done for you within the month, no problem.
Hope to hear from you soon!
~Heather Muessle
It is only in recent years, however, that shipwreck archaeology is beginning to be viewed as something that should be looked at as a discipline and a culture in and of itself, distinct from what is happening on land. Gibbins and Adams, for instance, suggest that wrecks should be viewed only in comparison to one another, to trace changes over time, and that a clearer picture of maritime culture could emerge thereby. They also believe that a more processual or even post-processual approach to shipwrecks could do far more for the discipline than using them as supplementary material ever could, especially considering the unique qualities shipwreck data has to offer (Gibbins and Adams 2001). What this could potentially involve is a complete separation of sea identities from terrestrial ones, at least in the way that wrecks are described and analyzed. As opposed to describing a wreck as Late Roman or Imperial Spanish, the solution may be to describe them more by a common set of features that imply, but do not identify a common heritage, and to analyze the contents and changes of those groups without expectations brought in by the links to terrestrial civilizations.