This is a essay however there is a part where you would need to login (Vx) and answer to a case in order to use that to write the essay i will tell you how to do this after you have accepted the project. We will need to do this first in order to start the essay since the essay is based on this. The Vx is the website where the case will be for you to respond to. i will attach a example of a case that has already been answered.
I will attach the [url removed, login to view] full details of the assessment is also attached. 'I' is allowable - and encouraged! And, for Q3 a necessity! Please use the Assess 2 Scaffolding for thinking doc to guide you. all the questions are broken down and easier to understand. Also read this attachment for the vx part too. [url removed, login to view]
the link once your on it ill give you the instructions to login
Question 1: Ethical concepts in practice: Autonomy
In this question your Vx Think Screen case will be assessed. Therefore your Vx response needs to demonstrate appropriate understanding of the concepts used within the Think Screen and you need to be considering wide, and potentially conflicting perspectives within your Vx case deliberation.
a) Respond to one of the following Vx cases and insert your Vx Report into your portfolio for grading.
I. Mandatory seasonal flu vaccine (choose this one)
II. Baby Boxes
III. Tagging Along
(Vx Case assesses LO 1; no set word limit)
Insert Vx Report here:
b) Using relevant scholarly literature, clear links to your chosen case and with Vx quotes, critically evaluate the importance and limits of creating and respecting individual autonomy in health care decisions. (Assesses LO 2; word limit 500).
Question 2: Learning from others
Background: One of the main philosophies of the Vx is decision transparency. The online framework provides a unique opportunity to learn about and from one another.
Explore the data for all responses to your completed Vx case in Question 1 above.
Here are the instructions:
1. Go to Reports
2. Click on ‘Quotes’ from top tool bar
3. Click on ‘You’ to access your own Report. You may wish to print or copy/paste so you have a copy at hand.
4. Next click on ‘Everyone’, or use the spanner icon at the far right of the toolbar to filter your search.
5. Identify a Report where a peer has used one or more of the Reactions screen choices to create an argument that is significantly different to yours.
6. Copy/Paste or take screen shots of the specific free text sections you have chosen to compare and present them in the table, provided within the assessment template.
Question: With supporting relevant academic literature and quoted examples from both reports, reflect on the differences in values in relation to your Reaction Screen concept and consider the impact of divergent views on patient/client/community health outcomes.
(Assesses LO3; word count 400).
Reactions screen comparison table:
Chosen Reactions ‘wedge’ (i.e. Law, Dignity, Emotion, Risk etc) Your own copy/pasted response to this ‘wedge’ Peer’s response to this same ‘wedge’ (please include their username)
Question 3: Reflecting on future practice
(use being a health promoter)
Reflecting on your responses to the ‘Revisiting What is ethics?’ survey along with your overall learning experience in PPE this semester, identify two learning experiences arising from the paper.
For each, describe the specific learning experience and reflect on the implications for your future practice/decision-making, specifically giving consideration to what you will do differently as a result of your learning?
(Assesses LO4; word count 400).
Professional Practice In Ethics essay