¥ an overview of the essence of the article with a brief discussion of the identified ethical issue(s)
¥ a discussion that links the essence of the article and ethical issues(s) to the theory (referenced theory to support your ideas is expected and will be deemed as essential)*. Here you also need to include your recommendations (that are realistic and practical) as a manager to resolve the issues identified in the article. If no resolution has been mentioned in the article, you can give your suggestions of how to resolve the issues here. If a resolution has been mentioned, discuss whether you would had resolved the issue in the same manner or other ways, and why.
¥ Who are the stakeholders being impacted (now and in the future) by the issue and how? Briefly discuss impact (positive and/or negative) on each stakeholder.
¥ a conclusion in which you proffer an opinion on the article’s ethical issue(s)
¥ an academic reference list that is constructed correctly (using Harvard )
2250 words per article (10% +/– is acceptable).
The reference list incorporating in-text references from both (2) articles should be included at the end of the last article following the Harvard referencing style.
An overview of the content of the article, and ethical issues.
Discussion of ethical issues and stakeholders impact
Discussion of the ethical issues raised in the news article is linked to referenced theory / philosophy
Recommendations to address the ethical issues raised
Academic English, structure and the presentation of the text
Referencing and acknowledging your sources of information.